Because I say I am!
By Cori Tyler
Sometimes, it seems, people
occasionally want to hear our opinions on a few things, or to discuss their
own, at least. If you’ve come to know us
at all, you already know that freedom is our most-loved human trait. Open, honest, free discussion is one of the
cornerstones of that freedom, all defended by our Right to Arms. I’m going to kick off the Last Line Blog with
a discussion on freedom, what liberty means to me, and the dangers I see all
around today. I hope you’ll throw a
comment or seven below and share your own thoughts.
I’ve seen, and even used to
agree with, intelligent people who argued that we don’t actually have any true
freedom at all. They cite several
historical examples of countless freedoms being trampled by governments. I remember reading this and thinking, “Holy
crap! We really have nothing!” Well, life moved me in directions I never
anticipated. I’ve had to rethink a lot
of my own beliefs. Many came out
strengthened, but some also changed. I’d
have to say this is probably the biggest one that’s different for me, now.
Do you know why I’m free? Is it because my government allows it? Is it because an academic somewhere defined
freedom in such a manner as to match my circumstances? I say no.
It is neither of those things. By
implying that a government can allow me freedom, the inverse implication is
they can take it from me. I’ve seen it
on internet memes, and I can’t think of a better way to say it. I am free because I say I am. I know, believe, and behave that I am.
Government can restrict and try
to take my freedom, to be sure. I can be
incarcerated, sued, gagged, and indoctrinated.
However – comma – as long as I hold myself as a free person, fight to
protect and preserve that freedom, exercise that freedom, and show others what
it looks like, I am free. I have liberty
to choose! I have free will to plan and
fight! I have a voice to speak!
This brings me to the dangers I
see for all of our liberties. It’s like
a muscle. If you don’t exercise it,
liberty can waste away until atrophied so much that you can’t use it
anymore. In our society of apathy, it
seems to me this is dangerously close to happening. What’s come to pass, then, is that as peoples’
liberties fall into disuse, there always seems to be a predator who is more
than willing to follow closely behind. I
picture a guy with a mustache, with a garbage can and broom on a cart. “You don’t need THIS anymore. You haven’t used it in ages!”
It’s hard to even pin it on one
political party anymore, too. To me,
that’s a sign of real trouble, when they’re all out to get us. You’ve got the Left, including the current
administration and Senate majority, who treat “journalists” (maybe we’ll
discuss THAT profession’s decline another time) according to their support for
their pet policies. Anyone who dares
disagree with them, or oppose their power grabs, is a racist, sexist, or one of
several other radical bad guy names. All
the while, they’re using bailouts and incentive plans to place government control
on as much of our world as they can. So
far, they’re deeply entrenched in technology and communications,
transportation, banking, education, and medicine. There aren’t many reaches of our daily lives
where they don’t already have control.
Of course, the so-called Right
can’t seem to help themselves either.
They really kicked the surveillance machine into overdrive on us with
the USA PATRIOT Act. The recent string
of bailouts opened with Bush’s banking and automotive industry fiascos,
too. It seems you can’t turn on the TV
or look at Facebook without someone claiming to be Republican either misquoting
the bible in diatribe against a group of people, or using their church
attendance record as part of the reason they should be in power. It seems like both sides’ primary interest is
growing their power base and proving each other inferior.
The whole time, those of us who
take exception to this kind of treatment and point out how far we’ve strayed
from an actual Constitutional Republic often hear how we’re reactionary or
radical. Sadly, some of the loudest
voices are the ones with the least understanding on their subject. What I’m saying is, it looks like the morons
often get the spotlight. We’re represented
by the guy who carries his rifle slung down the street, and is absolutely
surprised and shocked when police stop him.
Coincidentally, he has his video camera running the whole time, and
knows just enough of the Constitution (and watched just enough SVU) to
repeatedly ask “Am I being detained?” in response to every question the officer
asks him.
We’re represented by the people
who think liberty for all is fine, except for whichever phobia or prejudice
they harbor. And they’re the last ones
to recognize their position as such.
Often, they go back to misquoting the bible, or misrepresenting the
people they oppose. Nobody seems to use
any logic or sense in their discussions anymore, unless you ask them, of
course. Then, it’s the other side that
makes no sense.
I think this is where the power
brokers want us. Look at where they’ve
taken us so far. Realistically, the
current government controls the media.
Freedom of the press is withering.
Gun restrictions seem to be the cause du jour. Some states, and groups in all of the others,
push every day to see how close they can get to a ban and registry/confiscation
list. Judicial activism is rampant,
circumventing the legislative process entirely.
Just the other day, Democrats virtually eliminated the filibuster as a
legislative blockade, but only so long as the majority party chooses. Each day, we see stories of governmental
agencies detaining people without a warrant, or exigent circumstances based on
probable cause. The recent DNA and fluid
sample checkpoint in Texas, run by the NHTSA on the premise of research comes
to mind.
There’s a constant fight over
reallocation of wealth versus a free market.
There’s constant concern over so-called militarization of police versus
increasingly brutal and remorseless criminals (Knock-out game, anyone?). There’s countless other examples we can put
here of ways that our nation does not respect the individual freedoms our
Constitution says it should. For the
most part, much of the country seems content to just allow it to happen.
So, what now? I’ve given a lot of thought to that question
over the last few years. Countless
quotes address it. Edmund Burke: ““The only thing necessary for the triumph of
evil is that good men should do nothing.”
I, of course, learned that one from Michael Caine’s portrayal of Alfred,
Bruce Wayne’s butler. I ponder this
every day.
You see, a portion of my family
can trace its roots back directly to the Mayflower. I have a few ancestors who were involved in
our Revolutionary War against the tyranny of the British Crown. You may have heard of some of them: John Tyler, John Adams, John Quincy
Adams. These are some of the men who
really had to put their money where their mouths were. As the quote goes, they staked their
fortunes, their lives, and their reputations on the war for independence. Had they failed, history’s only memory of
them would have been as traitors to the King.
At one point, they had to look
at what was happening around them, look at their families and friends, and decide
their cause was important enough to leave their homes behind and risk
everything in hope their children would live independent from British attempts
to control them. They had to LEAVE THEIR
HOMES. That was a conscious decision
they had to make. History tells us that
only three percent of all colonists made that decision.
So, what now? Do we face a decision on leaving our homes
and going to war? I can’t say we won’t
at this point. I don’t think today is
that day, but it’s something I’ve had to worry about increasingly lately. And I do worry. I think if we ever reach that point, it may
be our Republic is forever lost. Even if
we won, we’d be weakened to such an extent that some outside power would surely
swoop in and take control. That doesn’t
mean we’ll be left with a choice. Not if
we’d call ourselves free.
As I write this, the estimated
U.S. population is 317,121,603. Three
percent of that is still almost ten million people. What would happen if all of those people voted,
and voted their conscience, in all future elections, instead of along party
lines? What if three percent said, “I am
free because I say I am”? If almost ten
million people took to the internet, or any other form of public discourse, to
push for a return to our nation’s Constitutional protections and a departure
from Washington D.C. power and wealth brokering, would we see a change? I think so.
No comments:
Post a Comment