. . . by Cori Tyler
Why do you train? I'm sure
you've likely put some thought into that question. Right?
Right? Sure you have!
If you're like me, you train to defend the people, places, and
things dearest to your heart. In fact, most
of the worst case scenarios I can imagine involve a threat to my family or
friends. I work to be effective in
defensive skills, whether with a firearm or unarmed combatives, or any number
of other possible weapons I might find in between. Hopefully, if the moment comes that I have to
use the skills I learned, I'm good enough to win. I intend to be.
Of course, when we talk about defensive skills, combatives,
weapons, or attackers, we're talking about an outcome where someone ends up
hurt. There's even a real chance someone
might end up dead. That's why this is
such a serious topic. We train to hurt
or kill people if it becomes necessary.
The alternative is we let them hurt or kill us, or even worse, someone
else we'd protect.
For non-self-defense-types, this is where they lost interest. How could anyone in their right mind want to
prepare to injure or kill someone? What
kind of person would even open themselves up to that possibility? Didn't our mommies, the Bible, or any number
of other potential sources of morality instruction impart that little tidbit on
us?
I know I learned "Thou shalt not kill" from an early
age. Of course, being curious and hungry
to keep learning, I looked beyond that initial learning to find there were a
lot of exceptions. Soldiers in battle,
peace officers in the righteous course of duty, and those defending what they
love all appear to be allowed to kill, when necessary. So, it seems the more complete iteration
might be "Thou shalt not MURDER."
We don't look to kill, or even injure someone else. We acknowledge that another's actions might
not leave us with a choice. In
preparing, we've likely drawn that line where acceptability ends for us. It's a good bet we can all envision scenarios
that really come close to that line, or blur it quite a bit.
How about injuring someone?
Are you prepared to break an assailant's arm, leg, fingers, elbow,
etc?
How else can you prepare?
My first foray as a training instructor was through the American
Red Cross - great organization, by the way.
Their training and assistance programs do countless good things every
single day. As a First Aid/CPR/AED
instructor, I taught correctional staff how to assist someone having a medical
emergency. I had students who used their
skills at work, and even more who used them outside of work, on family members.
When I first became a Defensive Tactics instructor in the same
place, I jokingly described my instruction as the total skills package. I could teach you how to break 'em and how to
put 'em back together. Part of that
characterization also came from the fact that, at that time, those two skills
categories were pretty much all we got for in-service training. So, I taught the total annual offering.
Time marched on, my career grew, changed, progressed – in step
with the rest of my life. I continued
acquiring and polishing skills wherever I could. Something I’ve added along the way,
originally out of necessity but maintained out of personal desire to keep those
skills, was certification as an EMT.
The joking from years ago comes back to me more often now, except
there’s some truth that rings through a lot more. To an extent, I really do know, and teach
others, how to break ‘em and how to put ‘em back together.
No, I’m not a doctor. Nor
am I a hardened killer.
I guess I’m trying to speak more to things that I think are
important to consider for a well-rounded set of skills. I think if I’m doing all this training,
studying, contemplating, learning, and improving my abilities in self-defense,
I have to balance it. I have to be able
to render aid of a type other than use-of-force.
Realistically, most people are likely to use medical skills more
often than self-defense skills. People
get hurt in accidents, get sick, and have other medical needs all the
time. Knowing how to deal with those
things is important.
Even the most skilled fighters get hit. If you have to defend yourself, your chances
of being injured are better than average.
If you’re shot, you might have to stop bleeding, while continuing the
fight. You may have won the fight, but
found yourself cut deeply, or suffering any other significant injury. You need to be able to provide care for your
injuries to truly survive.
Now, it gets surreal . . .
Fact is, if you have to defend yourself physically, you may face
the ironic perspective of being the one to provide medical aid to your attacker. If you knock someone out, you may have to
protect their spine and head from injury.
If you break one of their bones, you may have to splint it. If you shoot them, you may have to try to
control the bleeding.
I’m not talking about being soft on the bad guy. I’m talking about being the good guy in every
aspect. Not only is it important for
your humanity to assist where you can, but imagine the difference when you have
to explain your actions in court. It
sounds terrible, but it’s much better for you in that analysis if the bad guy
died in spite of your best lifesaving efforts than if they died abandoned in
the street, where you shot them.
Does this mean I think everyone should be an EMT? Nope.
I think if you are going to be a serious student of self-defense, you
should also prepare to address the consequences of defending yourself. You should be prepared to help everyone
survive the fight that can, after the conflict is resolved.
No comments:
Post a Comment